Fusion Studio 16 2 1
Author: l | 2025-04-25
A Fusion 9 Studio dongle will work with Fusion 16 Studio and DaVinci Resolve 16 Studio. Then download Fusion Studio 16.-Resolve Studio 18.1.1 /Fusion Studio 18.1.1 Mac Pro 2025 - 2.-Core 240 GB - AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 16 GB Radeon VII 16GB
Black Magic Fusion Studio 16 1 0 2
May need caching. I'm not sure the first gen of Apple silicon is doing 8K hardware decoding. The M2 does for sure. My disaster protection: export a .drp file to a physically separated storage regularly.www.digitalproduction.comStudio 19.1.3MacOS 13.7.4, 2017 iMac, 32 GB, Radeon Pro 580 + eGPUMacBook M1 Pro, 16 GPU cores, 32 GB RAM, MacOS 14.7.2SE, USM G3 evanfotis Posts: 97Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:42 pm Real Name: Evangelos Georgoulakis Fri Apr 07, 2023 1:16 pm Get the highest spec hardware you can afford. Even in 4k the m1max 32gb will lag if one has multiple fusion elements, titles multi layer chroma keying, noise reduction etc. Fri Apr 07, 2023 1:27 pm evanfotis wrote:Get the highest spec hardware you can afford. Even in 4k the m1max 32gb will lag if one has multiple fusion elements, titles multi layer chroma keying, noise reduction etc.True, but it looks like Fusion is not optimized at the moment and challenges even high performance desktop systems but it seems worse on Apple Silicon (fingers crossed BMD does some development there to improve performance on Apple Silicon). aka BarkinmaddResolve Studio 19.1.3 | Fusion Studio 19.1.3 | 16" MacBook Pro M1 MAX, 32 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD, Sequoia 15.3.1 Uli Plank Website Posts: 25326Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:48 amLocation: Germany and Indonesia Fri Apr 07, 2023 2:23 pm If Fusion is of primary concern, I'd get a high-end desktop PC with 128 GB.If you just need some motion graphics, get Apple's Motion for 50 bucks. My disaster protection: export a .drp file to a physically separated storage regularly.www.digitalproduction.comStudio 19.1.3MacOS 13.7.4, 2017 iMac, 32 GB, Radeon Pro 580 + eGPUMacBook M1 Pro, 16 GPU cores, 32 GB RAM, MacOS 14.7.2SE, USM G3 footofwrath Posts: 221Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2021 2:36 pm Real Name: Andrew Longhurst Sat Apr 08, 2023 12:12 am Uli Plank wrote:If Fusion is of primary concern, I'd get a high-end desktop PC with 128 GB.If you just need some motion graphics, get Apple's Motion for 50 bucks.I have that already, though 64Gb, not 128. THere is some 11K in
Blackmagic Fusion Studio 16 1 0 - hirelast
As the tracking point - looked great. Using Fusion is slower, but I would definitely use it if the tracking plane was more complex than a single point.Cheers aka BarkinmaddResolve Studio 19.1.3 | Fusion Studio 19.1.3 | 16" MacBook Pro M1 MAX, 32 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD, Sequoia 15.3.1 doubleJ Posts: 55Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:39 pm Real Name: Joshua Jackson Sat Jul 15, 2023 6:15 pm Well, unfortunately, neither of those options worked, for me.The issue is that they both seem to require whatever is selected to stay visible, the entire time.In this instance, I'm rock climbing.I tried a square around my body (the Fusion video idea) and it didn't track me at all.Then, I tried my face.The issue with that was my face turning away from the camera.I tried some of the gear, hanging from my harness, and it stopped following that.Now, what might work well is the new AI auto-framing function of 18.5 Studio.I'm not hip on spending $300, but it could be worth it.Thanks for the ideas, though...JJ Jim Simon Posts: 34657Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am Sat Jul 15, 2023 8:47 pm Smart Reframe might do this.Not sure what versions will have it available. My Biases:You NEED training.You NEED a desktop.You NEED a calibrated (non-computer) display. doubleJ Posts: 55Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:39 pm Real Name: Joshua Jackson Sun Jul 16, 2023 1:44 am I find it interesting that I can test the Super Scale with a watermark, but the Smart Reframe option isn't even visible on the free version.JJ Sun Jul 16, 2023 11:40 am doubleJ wrote:Well, unfortunately, neither of those options worked, for me.The issue is that they both seem to require whatever is selected to stay visible, the entire time.Not entirely true. You can stop the tracker at any point, select a new feature to track and then track ahead from there. You can also switch to frame mode in the tracker to make manual tweaks (adding keyframes) here and there. aka BarkinmaddResolve Studio 19.1.3 | Fusion Studio 19.1.3 | 16" MacBook Pro M1 MAX, 32 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD, Sequoia 15.3.1 doubleJ Posts: 55Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:39 pm Real Name: Joshua Jackson Mon May 06, 2024 9:23 pm Jim Simon wrote:Smart Reframe might do this.I just wanted to update this.I purchased Studio and have been using Smart Reframe.It does exactly what I was wanting.I take my 2160p portrait video, put it in a 1080p landscape timeline, frame myself as I want, and let it go.It does a pretty good job.JJ Return to DaVinci Resolve Who is online Users browsing this forum: Braindigger, digitallysane, MadXenon, ScottConoverCBH, SlaV05, Uwe Boettcher, Yasser Saeed and 392 guestsDaVinci Resolve Studio 16. Fusion Studio 16.
Login Register FAQ Search It is currently Mon Mar 17, 2025 5:22 am Print view problem with 16.2.1 install Message jhoepffner Website Posts: 210Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:43 amLocation: Paris Real Name: Jacques Hoepffner Wed Apr 22, 2020 4:57 pm what I obtain reapiring the ancient version BMFusionInstall.JPG (39.86 KiB) Viewed 883 times I just downloaded the last version and tried to install it but I have a message saying:...a network ressource is unavailable...I have the dongle, I tried to uninstall the last version but I have the same problem.I am now completly blocked with no fusion usable and i really hesitate ro upgrade Resolve_Can you help me, please? W10 Ryzen7 3800X nVidia 3090 RAM 64 DVR-Fusion Studio 19.0.1 SSD 2To raid0 32To (HD) raid0 8To (SSD)MSI G65 W10 / RAM 32 nVidia 1070 Intel Core i7-8750H DVR Studio 19.0.1MBP 15" (2012) OS 10.14.6 RAM 16 nVidia 650M Intell i7 DVR Studio 17.4 Wed Apr 22, 2020 5:15 pm jhoepffner wrote:BMFusionInstall.JPGI just downloaded the last version and tried to install it but I have a message saying:...a network ressource is unavailable...I have the dongle, I tried to uninstall the last version but I have the same problem.I am now completly blocked with no fusion usable and i really hesitate ro upgrade Resolve_Can you help me, please?Try to unzip before install. Blackmagic Design Certified Master TrainerBlackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera (Samyang 12mm Cine, 35mm Cine)DaVinci Resolve Studio 17.4.4.0007Speed Editor 1.4.1Windows 10 Pro 21H1, i7-7700, 32Gb RAM, SSD, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11Gb (471.68 Studio) jhoepffner Website Posts: 210Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:43 amLocation: Paris Real Name: Jacques Hoepffner Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:39 pm Thanks, I will try but last time I had updated with a zipped .msi W10 Ryzen7 3800X nVidia 3090 RAM 64 DVR-Fusion Studio 19.0.1 SSD 2To raid0 32To (HD) raid0 8To (SSD)MSI G65 W10 / RAM 32 nVidia 1070 Intel Core i7-8750H DVR Studio 19.0.1MBP 15" (2012) OS 10.14.6 RAM 16 nVidia 650M Intell i7 DVR Studio 17.4 Return to Fusion Who is online Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests. A Fusion 9 Studio dongle will work with Fusion 16 Studio and DaVinci Resolve 16 Studio.COLOUR MATCHING : Fusion Studio 16 (or) Davinci Resolve 16 Fusion
DoP, editor, musician, just a guy for everything.www.n13-media.dewww.instagram.com/xnthirteenx pperquin Website Posts: 23Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 8:31 amLocation: France Real Name: philippe perquin Mon Dec 02, 2024 1:51 pm for me only slow for the mac version (france) Philippe Perquin kfriis Posts: 572Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2021 10:14 am Real Name: Kurt Friis Hansen Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:03 pm Same here in Denmark on a (working) 1 Gbit connection.Periodically receiving small packets in the region 2x-3xk - less than 100k - separated by huuuuge and loooong pauses.Not per second speed - but per "spit" speed I've received 160+ megabyte, out of 5.75 GByte, and the prognosis jumps wildly around 4 hours and 15 to 20 minutes - periodically even higher - before completion. Or an average speed of (let's be nice) .... ehhh ... not really that fast is the nicest term I could find at the moment.Highly unusual.Regards Last edited by kfriis on Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total. Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:03 pm Slow for the Mac version, Ontario, Canada.Add - Btw - the Fusion Studio 19.1.1 downloaded very quickly. Last edited by Steve Alexander on Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total. aka BarkinmaddResolve Studio 19.1.3 | Fusion Studio 19.1.3 | 16" MacBook Pro M1 MAX, 32 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD, Sequoia 15.3.1 Tim Snider Posts: 10Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2023 1:26 pm Real Name: Tim Snider Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:04 pm Super slow in NC - DR Studio 19.1.1 for Mac. Estimating 4 hours. Fritsx Posts: 1Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:03 pm Real Name: Frits Hogewoning Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:12 pm It's the same here in the Netherlands. Have been trying to download all days and still didn'tRelease of Fusion 16 Studio and DaVinci Resolve 16 Studio
Original subject line: "Fusion optical flow in timeline (Smooth motion / Tween / TimeSpeed)"HelloIf you want to use the Fusion time manipulating functions, where do you set them so they affect the timeline?My question comes from a lack of understanding of how to implement a workflow where a source clip is X seconds and destination clip should be Y seconds, where Y is X*slowdown factor.Can I put the source into a timeline, set the clip speed as Z% and use the Fusion Optical Flow node + TimeSpeed node to do the actual computation in the Fusion page? It is also my understanding that the Fusion Optical flow is better (based on reading here on the forum and the documentation that calculations should be run overnight) than the semi realtime version in the timeline. Is that true?Is the Fusion “Time Speed [TS]” better than “Speed Warp”?Is the Fusion “Time Stretcher [TST]” better than “Speed Warp”?Is the Fusion “Smooth Motion [SM]” better than “Speed Warp”?I have done the required reading, under the comparison of Fusion in Resolve and Fusion Studio 16, in the section “Retiming”: Optical Flow based retiming. YES | YESLinear and Non-Linear retiming of clips. YES | YESAnimatable frame interpolation and blending for smoother motion. YES | YES“Optical Flow Tools” Fusion in DaVinci Resolve Studio 16 | Fusion Studio 16Optical Flow analysis for generating forward and back vectors. YES | YESChange the speed of a clip using optical flow analysis. YES | YESRepairFrame regenerates a frame using optical flow between its two neighbors. YES | YESSmoothMotion for smoothing of color or aux channels using optical flow. YES | YESTween interpolates between two non-sequential images YES | YES(which leads me to believe it is possible to use Optical flow in Fusion in Resolve)Furthermore, I have read “Fusion9_Tool_Reference” (because there isn’t a version 16 tool reference), chapter 22: Optical Flow [OF] and the contents of how to use the tool. In “Fusion9_Manual”, chapter 17, page 496 and onward describes how to use the tool as well, but with the base understanding that the result is rendered out and used in another software, meaning that the operation is timeline time independent (meaning that the tool does not care about how the clip is set up in a timeline). In the Davinci Resolve 16 Manual, chapter 71 (page 1321) and Chapter 95 (page 1762) are basically identical to Chapter 17 in the Fusion 9 manual, but do not answer the timeline question.Chapter 73 in the Davinci Resolve 16 Manual (page 1349) mentions a timeline. Is that timeline the same as the Edit page timeline?Page 426 (Features in the Cut page) describes how to use Optical Flow to lengthen a clip, which is identical to the “Change speed” menu in the Edit page, in terms of function.I have spent a long time reading about the different functions, and would appreciate long, well thought out responses.Best regards MadsDavinci Resolve Studio 19.1.3 Build 7, Windows 11, 13400F, Nvidia 3060 TI, 572.60 StudioRelease of DaVinci Resolve 16 Studio and Fusion 16 Studio
Login Register FAQ Search It is currently Tue Mar 11, 2025 5:58 pm Print view Tracker To Keep The Subject In The Center Of The Frame Message doubleJ Posts: 55Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:39 pm Real Name: Joshua Jackson Tue May 16, 2023 9:10 pm Hello...I have 4k footage that I crop in and focus on a subject as it moves.My workflow is to zoom and position to frame and then keyframe all the subsequent zooms and positions.I was thinking that it might be doable with a tracker.The only issue is that the tracker usually keeps another object attached to the subject as it moves.I kind of want to do the complete opposite.Would this be possible?Thanks...JJ GalinMcMahon Posts: 853Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 10:14 pm Real Name: Galin McMahon Tue May 16, 2023 11:02 pm You want to use a tracker to do the opposite of tracking? That makes no sense. If you explain what you're trying to do rather than what you're not trying to do, I think we may be inclined to offer suggestions. Eluktronics laptop w/40901+4 TB nvmes32GB RAMStream DeckResolve Studio 18.6 RCModelReviews Posts: 1322Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 1:39 am Real Name: Bruce Simpson Tue May 16, 2023 11:21 pm Sounds like you want to use the stabilizer.I do this a lot and use the Classic Stabilizer in point-track mode. It works very well, except for a *really* annoying pointer-position update bug if you're stepping single-frame through the tracking process.It's on the color page. Resolve 19.0 Studio, Fusion 9 StudioCPU: i7 8700, OS: Windows 10 32GB RAM, GPU: RTX3060I'm refugee from Sony Vegas slicing video for my YouTube channels. xunile Website Posts: 3109Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 5:21 am Real Name: Eric Eisenmann Tue May 16, 2023 11:23 pm This video might help with what you are wanting. Win 10 Home | Intel i7 - 10700f 64 GB 1 TB GB SSD 2 TB SSDRTX-3060 12 GB | Resolve Studio 18.6.6| Fusion Studio 18.6.6Win 10 Home | Intel Core I7-7700HQ 32 GB 1 TB NVME SSD 1 TB SATA SSDGTX-1060-6GB | Resolve 17.4.6 doubleJ Posts: 55Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:39 pm Real Name: Joshua Jackson Wed May 17, 2023 2:48 am xunile wrote:This video might help with what you are wanting. This might be exactly what I was looking for.Thanks...JJ Wed May 17, 2023 12:57 pm As Bruce suggested, above, you can also use the stabilizer on the color page - use the 'Classic Stabilizer' from the 3-dot menu and then select 'Point Tracker' from the drop-list. Leave only pan and tilt checked (top of panel). Add a tracking point (lower-left of panel) and move it to the point you wish to keep motionless. Track forward and back (double-arrows) and after the tracking is completed, click on the 'Stabilize' button. Since 'Zoom' (at the bottom of the panel) is checked by default, the image will zoom in to hide the exposed borders.Tried this on a subject walking toward the camera, using her dominant eye. A Fusion 9 Studio dongle will work with Fusion 16 Studio and DaVinci Resolve 16 Studio. Then download Fusion Studio 16.-Resolve Studio 18.1.1 /Fusion Studio 18.1.1 Mac Pro 2025 - 2.-Core 240 GB - AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 16 GB Radeon VII 16GBComments
May need caching. I'm not sure the first gen of Apple silicon is doing 8K hardware decoding. The M2 does for sure. My disaster protection: export a .drp file to a physically separated storage regularly.www.digitalproduction.comStudio 19.1.3MacOS 13.7.4, 2017 iMac, 32 GB, Radeon Pro 580 + eGPUMacBook M1 Pro, 16 GPU cores, 32 GB RAM, MacOS 14.7.2SE, USM G3 evanfotis Posts: 97Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:42 pm Real Name: Evangelos Georgoulakis Fri Apr 07, 2023 1:16 pm Get the highest spec hardware you can afford. Even in 4k the m1max 32gb will lag if one has multiple fusion elements, titles multi layer chroma keying, noise reduction etc. Fri Apr 07, 2023 1:27 pm evanfotis wrote:Get the highest spec hardware you can afford. Even in 4k the m1max 32gb will lag if one has multiple fusion elements, titles multi layer chroma keying, noise reduction etc.True, but it looks like Fusion is not optimized at the moment and challenges even high performance desktop systems but it seems worse on Apple Silicon (fingers crossed BMD does some development there to improve performance on Apple Silicon). aka BarkinmaddResolve Studio 19.1.3 | Fusion Studio 19.1.3 | 16" MacBook Pro M1 MAX, 32 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD, Sequoia 15.3.1 Uli Plank Website Posts: 25326Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:48 amLocation: Germany and Indonesia Fri Apr 07, 2023 2:23 pm If Fusion is of primary concern, I'd get a high-end desktop PC with 128 GB.If you just need some motion graphics, get Apple's Motion for 50 bucks. My disaster protection: export a .drp file to a physically separated storage regularly.www.digitalproduction.comStudio 19.1.3MacOS 13.7.4, 2017 iMac, 32 GB, Radeon Pro 580 + eGPUMacBook M1 Pro, 16 GPU cores, 32 GB RAM, MacOS 14.7.2SE, USM G3 footofwrath Posts: 221Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2021 2:36 pm Real Name: Andrew Longhurst Sat Apr 08, 2023 12:12 am Uli Plank wrote:If Fusion is of primary concern, I'd get a high-end desktop PC with 128 GB.If you just need some motion graphics, get Apple's Motion for 50 bucks.I have that already, though 64Gb, not 128. THere is some 11K in
2025-04-18As the tracking point - looked great. Using Fusion is slower, but I would definitely use it if the tracking plane was more complex than a single point.Cheers aka BarkinmaddResolve Studio 19.1.3 | Fusion Studio 19.1.3 | 16" MacBook Pro M1 MAX, 32 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD, Sequoia 15.3.1 doubleJ Posts: 55Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:39 pm Real Name: Joshua Jackson Sat Jul 15, 2023 6:15 pm Well, unfortunately, neither of those options worked, for me.The issue is that they both seem to require whatever is selected to stay visible, the entire time.In this instance, I'm rock climbing.I tried a square around my body (the Fusion video idea) and it didn't track me at all.Then, I tried my face.The issue with that was my face turning away from the camera.I tried some of the gear, hanging from my harness, and it stopped following that.Now, what might work well is the new AI auto-framing function of 18.5 Studio.I'm not hip on spending $300, but it could be worth it.Thanks for the ideas, though...JJ Jim Simon Posts: 34657Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:47 am Sat Jul 15, 2023 8:47 pm Smart Reframe might do this.Not sure what versions will have it available. My Biases:You NEED training.You NEED a desktop.You NEED a calibrated (non-computer) display. doubleJ Posts: 55Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:39 pm Real Name: Joshua Jackson Sun Jul 16, 2023 1:44 am I find it interesting that I can test the Super Scale with a watermark, but the Smart Reframe option isn't even visible on the free version.JJ Sun Jul 16, 2023 11:40 am doubleJ wrote:Well, unfortunately, neither of those options worked, for me.The issue is that they both seem to require whatever is selected to stay visible, the entire time.Not entirely true. You can stop the tracker at any point, select a new feature to track and then track ahead from there. You can also switch to frame mode in the tracker to make manual tweaks (adding keyframes) here and there. aka BarkinmaddResolve Studio 19.1.3 | Fusion Studio 19.1.3 | 16" MacBook Pro M1 MAX, 32 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD, Sequoia 15.3.1 doubleJ Posts: 55Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:39 pm Real Name: Joshua Jackson Mon May 06, 2024 9:23 pm Jim Simon wrote:Smart Reframe might do this.I just wanted to update this.I purchased Studio and have been using Smart Reframe.It does exactly what I was wanting.I take my 2160p portrait video, put it in a 1080p landscape timeline, frame myself as I want, and let it go.It does a pretty good job.JJ Return to DaVinci Resolve Who is online Users browsing this forum: Braindigger, digitallysane, MadXenon, ScottConoverCBH, SlaV05, Uwe Boettcher, Yasser Saeed and 392 guests
2025-04-17DoP, editor, musician, just a guy for everything.www.n13-media.dewww.instagram.com/xnthirteenx pperquin Website Posts: 23Joined: Thu May 23, 2019 8:31 amLocation: France Real Name: philippe perquin Mon Dec 02, 2024 1:51 pm for me only slow for the mac version (france) Philippe Perquin kfriis Posts: 572Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2021 10:14 am Real Name: Kurt Friis Hansen Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:03 pm Same here in Denmark on a (working) 1 Gbit connection.Periodically receiving small packets in the region 2x-3xk - less than 100k - separated by huuuuge and loooong pauses.Not per second speed - but per "spit" speed I've received 160+ megabyte, out of 5.75 GByte, and the prognosis jumps wildly around 4 hours and 15 to 20 minutes - periodically even higher - before completion. Or an average speed of (let's be nice) .... ehhh ... not really that fast is the nicest term I could find at the moment.Highly unusual.Regards Last edited by kfriis on Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total. Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:03 pm Slow for the Mac version, Ontario, Canada.Add - Btw - the Fusion Studio 19.1.1 downloaded very quickly. Last edited by Steve Alexander on Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total. aka BarkinmaddResolve Studio 19.1.3 | Fusion Studio 19.1.3 | 16" MacBook Pro M1 MAX, 32 GPU cores, 64 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD, Sequoia 15.3.1 Tim Snider Posts: 10Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2023 1:26 pm Real Name: Tim Snider Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:04 pm Super slow in NC - DR Studio 19.1.1 for Mac. Estimating 4 hours. Fritsx Posts: 1Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:03 pm Real Name: Frits Hogewoning Mon Dec 02, 2024 2:12 pm It's the same here in the Netherlands. Have been trying to download all days and still didn't
2025-04-03Original subject line: "Fusion optical flow in timeline (Smooth motion / Tween / TimeSpeed)"HelloIf you want to use the Fusion time manipulating functions, where do you set them so they affect the timeline?My question comes from a lack of understanding of how to implement a workflow where a source clip is X seconds and destination clip should be Y seconds, where Y is X*slowdown factor.Can I put the source into a timeline, set the clip speed as Z% and use the Fusion Optical Flow node + TimeSpeed node to do the actual computation in the Fusion page? It is also my understanding that the Fusion Optical flow is better (based on reading here on the forum and the documentation that calculations should be run overnight) than the semi realtime version in the timeline. Is that true?Is the Fusion “Time Speed [TS]” better than “Speed Warp”?Is the Fusion “Time Stretcher [TST]” better than “Speed Warp”?Is the Fusion “Smooth Motion [SM]” better than “Speed Warp”?I have done the required reading, under the comparison of Fusion in Resolve and Fusion Studio 16, in the section “Retiming”: Optical Flow based retiming. YES | YESLinear and Non-Linear retiming of clips. YES | YESAnimatable frame interpolation and blending for smoother motion. YES | YES“Optical Flow Tools” Fusion in DaVinci Resolve Studio 16 | Fusion Studio 16Optical Flow analysis for generating forward and back vectors. YES | YESChange the speed of a clip using optical flow analysis. YES | YESRepairFrame regenerates a frame using optical flow between its two neighbors. YES | YESSmoothMotion for smoothing of color or aux channels using optical flow. YES | YESTween interpolates between two non-sequential images YES | YES(which leads me to believe it is possible to use Optical flow in Fusion in Resolve)Furthermore, I have read “Fusion9_Tool_Reference” (because there isn’t a version 16 tool reference), chapter 22: Optical Flow [OF] and the contents of how to use the tool. In “Fusion9_Manual”, chapter 17, page 496 and onward describes how to use the tool as well, but with the base understanding that the result is rendered out and used in another software, meaning that the operation is timeline time independent (meaning that the tool does not care about how the clip is set up in a timeline). In the Davinci Resolve 16 Manual, chapter 71 (page 1321) and Chapter 95 (page 1762) are basically identical to Chapter 17 in the Fusion 9 manual, but do not answer the timeline question.Chapter 73 in the Davinci Resolve 16 Manual (page 1349) mentions a timeline. Is that timeline the same as the Edit page timeline?Page 426 (Features in the Cut page) describes how to use Optical Flow to lengthen a clip, which is identical to the “Change speed” menu in the Edit page, in terms of function.I have spent a long time reading about the different functions, and would appreciate long, well thought out responses.Best regards MadsDavinci Resolve Studio 19.1.3 Build 7, Windows 11, 13400F, Nvidia 3060 TI, 572.60 Studio
2025-03-29